The Schematic Basis of the Metaphors in the Proverbs of Eastern Guilan

Document Type : Research original ,Regular Article

Authors
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics & Foreign Languages, Payame Noor University
2 . M.A in General Linguistics, Payame Noor University
.
Abstract
 
The current research has explored the schematic basis of the metaphors in the proverbs of Eastern Guilan within the framework of cognitive semantics, based on Evans and Green’s schematic model (2006). Cultures along with social identities are well reflected in the proverbs and therefore studying proverbs are of focal importance in linguistics. Studying the discursive use of proverbs in a given culture diachronically will reveal their cognitive -and sociological- function. Moreover, image schemas are dynamic patterns in cognitive semantics which are not studied thoroughly in Iranian dialects; in fact there are only few studies on the subject. The present study was designed in a descriptive- analytic manner to study mentioned concepts.Upon the analysis of data, it became apparent that the general types of image schemas provided by Evans and Green such asspace schema, containment schema, locomotion schema, force schema, unity schema, balance schema, identity schema and existence schema could be traced in the proverbs of Eastern Guilan.
Keywords

قربانی‌‌سیاه‌‌کوچه، مریم (1385). «بررسی معنایی، ساختاری و زیبا‌‌شناختی ضرب‌‌المثل‌‌های شرق گیلان»، پایان‌‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌‌ارشد زبان‌شناسی همگانی، دانشگاه پیام نور تهران.
نوربخش، علیرضا (1382). ضرب‌‌المثل‌‌های گیلکی به گویش مردم نواحی شرق گیلان، گیلان: گویه.
یوسفی‌‌راد، فاطمه (1382). «بررسی استعارۀ زمان در زبان فارسی در چهارچوب معنی‌‌شناسی شناختی»، پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌‌ارشد زبان‌‌شناسی همگانی، دانشگاه تربیت‌‌ مدرس.
 
Cieslicka, Anna (2002). “Comprehension and Interpretation of Proverbs in L2”, Studia Anglica Posnaniensia: International Review of English Studies.
Evans, Vyvyan & Melanie Green (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction, Edinburgh University Press.
Evans, Vyvyan, K. Benjamin Bergen, and Jörg Zinken (eds) (2007). “The Cognitive Linguistics Enterprise: An overview”, The Cognitive Linguistics Reader, Equinox Publishers.
Gibbs, Jr., W. Raymond, M. D. Johnson, and H. L. Colston (1996). “How to Study Proverb Understanding”, Metaphor & Symbol, Vol. 11, Issue 3.
Johnson, Mark. (1987). The Body in Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason, The University of Chicago Press.
Johnson, Mark and George Lakoff (2002). “Why Cognitive Linguistics Requires Embodied Realism”, Cognitive Linguistics, 13-3.
Katz, Albert N. (1999). “Proverb in Mind” (Book Review), Metaphors & Symbols, Vol. 14, Issue 1.
Lakoff, George (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind, The University of Chicago Press
Muller, Ulrich and W. F. Overton (1998). “How to Grow a Baby: A Reevaluation of Image- Schema and Piagetion Action Approaches to Representation”, Human Development, (Karger AG). Vol. 41, Issue 2.
Thomas, N. J. T (2003). A Note on Image and Image Schema, http://www. Calstatela. Edu/ faculty/ n Thomas/ Schemata. Html
Yu, Ning (2003). “Chinese Metaphors of Thinking”, Paper presented at the 7th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Cognitive Linguistics, 14-2/3.
Volume 4, Issue 8 - Serial Number 8
October 2014
Pages 75-94

  • Receive Date 06 November 2013
  • Revise Date 11 December 2013
  • Accept Date 18 December 2013