Document Type : Research original ,Regular Article
Abstract
The literary and artistic beauty of Hafez's sonnets is obvious to everyone but these beauties become more apparent when compared to the other poets' poems and especially the ghazals that he was interested in. Such studies may partially reveal why the lovers' ghazas receive more enjoy by readings of Hafez's ghazals incomparison with the similar ghazals of others. Systemic functional linguistics, which has been shown to be effective in analyzing literary texts, can help in answering this question. In Haliday's systematic, experiential metafunction represent human experience from the outside and inside world, and in fact expresses the content of the clause that is expressed by the main verb and referred to as the process. hence, in the present study, using descriptive - analytical and statistical method, we seek to answer the question of what differences exist, and what effect these differences have, or effects on the ghazal style of the two poets, and their literary enjoyment of their poetry. The results of this research suggest that although both of these works have been written in a common genre (ghazal) and have a roughly similar background, the verbal choices differ from their language. Hafiz has paid more attention to the use of "mental and emotional" processes and "material transformation" processes, and the distinction of the style of the ghazals in comparison with Salman’s ghazals is in the emotional color and smell of his sonnets, as well as the dynamics of his ghazals.
10. Eggins, S. (2004). An Introduction to Systemic Functionl Linguistics. New York: Continuum.
11. Halliday, M.A.K. and Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
12. Halliday, M.A.K. and C.M.I.M. Matthiessen (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Third ed. London: Arnold Publication.
13. Hasan, R. (1985). Linguistics, Language & Verbal Art. Deaken University press
14. Thompson, G. (2004). Introducing Functional Grammar. London: Arnold Publication.
)