Language Studies

Language Studies

Stylistic Differences of Hafez and Salman Savoji’s Ghazals (Based on Verb)

Document Type : Research original ,Regular Article

Author
tahereh ishany
Assistant Professor of Persian Language & Literature. Institute for Humanities & Cultural Studies
10.30465/ls.2019.4390
Abstract
The literary and artistic beauty of Hafez's sonnets is obvious to everyone but these beauties become more apparent when compared to the other poets' poems and especially the ghazals that he was interested in. Such studies may partially reveal why the lovers' ghazas receive more enjoy by readings of Hafez's ghazals incomparison with the similar ghazals of others. Systemic functional linguistics, which has been shown to be effective in analyzing literary texts, can help in answering this question. In Haliday's systematic, experiential metafunction represent human experience from the outside and inside world, and in fact expresses the content of the clause that is expressed by the main verb and referred to as the process. hence, in the present study, using descriptive - analytical and statistical method, we seek to answer the question of what differences exist, and what effect these differences have, or effects on the ghazal style of the two poets, and their literary enjoyment of their poetry. The results of this research suggest that although both of these works have been written in a common genre (ghazal) and have a roughly similar background, the verbal choices differ from their language. Hafiz has paid more attention to the use of "mental and emotional" processes and "material transformation" processes, and the distinction of the style of the ghazals in comparison with Salman’s ghazals is in the emotional color and smell of his sonnets, as well as the dynamics of his ghazals.
Keywords
Hafez Shirazi
Salman Savoji
Systemic Functionla linguistics
Experiential Metafunction
Verb
  1. حافظ شیرازی. (1362). دیوان خواجه شمس‏الدّین محمّد حافظ شیرازی. به اهتمام محمّد قزوینی و قاسم غنی. چاپ چهارم. تهران: زوّار.
  2. دبیرمقدم، محمد. (1386). زبان‌شناسی نظری؛ پیدایش و تکوین دستور زایشی. ویراست دوّم. چاپ دوّم با اصلاحات. تهران: سمت.
  3. ساوجی، سلمان بن محمّد. (1389). کلیّات سلمان ساوجی (با تجدیدنظر کلّی و افزودن قصیدة مصنوع با نسخه‏های جدید). مقدمه و تصحیح عباسعلی وفایی. تهران: سخن.
  4. شمیسا، سیروس. (1372). سبک‏شناسی. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه پیام نور.
  5. صافی، حسین. (1388). داستان از این قرار بود. تهران: رخ‌داد نو.
  6. صفا، ذبیح الله. (1380). تاریخ ادبیات ایران. تهران: فردوسی
  7. کرد چگینی، فاطمه؛ تقی پورنامداریان. (1392). «تأثیر گزینش ادبی در سبک با تأکید بر دیدگاه پاول سیمپسون». کهن‏نامة ادب پارسی. سال چهارم. شمارة اوّل. بهار. صص 93-69.
  8. نبی‏لو، علیرضا. (1392). «بررسی و تحلیل دو غزل از خاقانی و حافظ بر مبنای زبان‏شناسی نقش‏گرای سیستمی. نشریة زبان‏ و ادب فارسی دانشگاه تبریز. دورة 66،شمارة 227. صص 113- 135.
  9. وردانک، پیتر. (1389). مبانی سبک‌شناسی. ترجمۀ محمّد غفاری. تهران: نشر نی.

 

10. Eggins, S. (2004). An Introduction to Systemic Functionl Linguistics. New York: Continuum.

11. Halliday, M.A.K. and Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

12. Halliday, M.A.K. and C.M.I.M. Matthiessen (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Third ed. London: Arnold Publication.

13. Hasan, R. (1985). Linguistics, Language & Verbal Art. Deaken University press

14. Thompson, G. (2004). Introducing Functional Grammar. London: Arnold Publication.

  • Receive Date 02 May 2019
  • Revise Date 20 July 2019
  • Accept Date 30 August 2019