• Register
  • Login
  • Persian

Language Studies

  1. Home
  2. Typological Comparison of Relative Structures in Azerbaijani Turkish, Korean, Hungarian and Persian

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

Typological Comparison of Relative Structures in Azerbaijani Turkish, Korean, Hungarian and Persian

    Authors

    • Mohammad Hossein Khani 1
    • Mahinnaz Mirdehghan 2

    1 PhD Student- Linguistics Department Shahid Beheshti University

    2 Associate Professor of Linguistics, Shahid Beheshti University

,

Document Type : Research original ,Regular Article

10.30465/ls.2020.5854
  • Article Information
  • References
  • Download
  • How to cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to answer this question: what are the similar and different typological features of Azerbaijani Turkish, Korean, Hungarian and Persian languages? In our analysis, we have used Chomsky`s Generative-Transformational Grammar and Government and Binding theory. We have studied the movement of the subject and object nominal phrases and the concept of the empty position. The results of the research show that the similarities between the relative structures of these languages are the existence of movement for the transformation of the deep-structure into the relative clause, also the formation of a chain between the head noun and the empty position in the clause. And the differences in the relative structures of these languages are; the relative clauses of Azerbaijani Turkish, Korean, and Hungarian are pre-nominal while in Persian it is post-nominal. Also, the movement of the head noun in the Azerbaijani Turkish, Korean, and Hungarian is to the right and the end of the sentence, but in Persian is to the left and the beginning of the sentence. Another significant difference is the transformation of the verb of the subordinate sentence to the participle in the Ural-Altaic languages while Persian relative clause is a finite one

Keywords

  • Typology
  • Azerbaijani Turkish
  • Korean
  • Hungarian
  • Persian
  • XML
  • PDF 297.33 K
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
References
منابع
دبیرمقدم، محمد (1392). رده­شناسی زبان­های ایرانی. ج 1، تهران، سمت.
Chomsky, Noam (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding,         Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, Noam (1957). Syntactic Structure, London, The Hague, Paris: Mouton & Co..
Comrie, Bernard (1983). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Basil Blackwell.
Han, Chung-hye - Kim, Jong Bok (2003), “Are there double relative clauses in Korean?”, Linguistic Inquiry, v. 35-2, pp. 179-217.
Karabulut, Ferhat - Ulutaş, İsmail (2011), Türk Dili Sıfat-Fiilli Yapı Tipolojisinin Japon, Kore ve Macar Tipolojileri ile Karşılaştırılması, in Turkish Studies- International Periodical For The Languages, literature and History of Turkish or Turkic v. 6/1 Winter 2011, pp. 1349-1377, TURKEY.
Kiss, Katalin (2002). The Syntax of Hungarian, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge UK.
Laczko, Tibor (2002). “Control and Complex Event Nominals Hungarian”, Proceedings of the LFG conference, Athens, CSLI, (ed) M. Butt, T.H.King. p. 68.
Lehmann, Christian (1986). “On the Typology of Relative Clauses”, Linguistics,v. 24-4F, pp. 663-680.
Payne, T.E. (2006). Exploring language structure.Cambridge [u.a.]: Cambridge University Press.
 
Underhill, Robert (1972). “Turkish Participle”, Linguistic Inquiry. v. 3, pp. 87-99.
Yoshiko, Tagashira (1972). “Relative Clauses in Korean”, in The Chicago Which Hunt: Papers from the Relative Clause Festival,Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago.
    • Article View: 1,005
    • PDF Download: 389
Language Studies
Volume 10, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2
November 2019
Pages 1-23
Files
  • XML
  • PDF 297.33 K
History
  • Receive Date: 18 November 2019
  • Revise Date: 11 January 2021
  • Accept Date: 21 January 2020
Share
How to cite
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
Statistics
  • Article View: 1,005
  • PDF Download: 389

APA

Khani, M. H. and Mirdehghan, M. (2020). Typological Comparison of Relative Structures in Azerbaijani Turkish, Korean, Hungarian and Persian. Language Studies, 10(2), 1-23. doi: 10.30465/ls.2020.5854

MLA

Khani, M. H. , and Mirdehghan, M. . "Typological Comparison of Relative Structures in Azerbaijani Turkish, Korean, Hungarian and Persian", Language Studies, 10, 2, 2020, 1-23. doi: 10.30465/ls.2020.5854

HARVARD

Khani, M. H., Mirdehghan, M. (2020). 'Typological Comparison of Relative Structures in Azerbaijani Turkish, Korean, Hungarian and Persian', Language Studies, 10(2), pp. 1-23. doi: 10.30465/ls.2020.5854

CHICAGO

M. H. Khani and M. Mirdehghan, "Typological Comparison of Relative Structures in Azerbaijani Turkish, Korean, Hungarian and Persian," Language Studies, 10 2 (2020): 1-23, doi: 10.30465/ls.2020.5854

VANCOUVER

Khani, M. H., Mirdehghan, M. Typological Comparison of Relative Structures in Azerbaijani Turkish, Korean, Hungarian and Persian. Language Studies, 2020; 10(2): 1-23. doi: 10.30465/ls.2020.5854

  • Home
  • About Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap

News

  • Article Submission & Processing Charges 2024-01-23
  • DOI International Dedication to Articles in the Journal ... 2020-10-31

Newsletter Subscription

Subscribe to the journal newsletter and receive the latest news and updates

© Journal management system. designed by sinaweb