• Register
  • Login
  • Persian

Language Studies

  1. Home
  2. The Role of the Neuro-Linguistic Programming in the Improvement of the Non-Iranian PFL Learners’ Autonomy and Motivation

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

The Role of the Neuro-Linguistic Programming in the Improvement of the Non-Iranian PFL Learners’ Autonomy and Motivation

    Authors

    • Alireza Keyvani 1
    • Mohammad Reza Oroji 2
    • Sakineh Jafari 3
    • Siros Izadpanah 3

    1 PhD Student of Linguistics, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran,

    2 Assistant Professor of Linguistics, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran (Corresponding Author),

    3 Assistant Professor of TEFL, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran

,

Document Type : Research original ,Regular Article

10.30465/ls.2022.39912.2038
  • Article Information
  • References
  • Download
  • How to cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

The present article dealt with the effect of neuro-linguistic programming on the independent variables of autonomy and motivation of foreign learners of Persian. Neuro-linguistic programming refers to a view in which a person is a complete system of mind and body. The research method was quasi-experimental with pre-test and post-test. Participants were selected based on non-random sampling, availability, and manageability, but were randomly assigned to control and experimental groups. The purpose of this study was to answer the question of whether neuro-linguistic programming techniques had a significant effect on students' autonomy and motivation. Statistical analyses included calculating the reliability of the level determination test, mean and standard deviation of scores (descriptive statistics) and the validity of the two assessors in the experimental stage and the conversation part in the post-test were calculated using Pearson test and dispersion according to normality. In the analysis of Hypotheses, MANCOVA was used to examine the differences in the mean scores of the control and experimental groups in the pretest and posttest. The tool of statistical analysis of this research was SPSS statistical software (version 25). The results showed that the Neuro-linguistic programming techniques could improve PFL learners’ levels of motivation and autonomy.

Keywords

  • Autonomy
  • motivation
  • Neuro-Linguistic Programming
  • Persian as a Foreign Language (PFL)

Main Subjects

  • General linguistics
  • XML
  • PDF 261.74 K
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
References
 
Arkoç, E. Ş. (2008). The impact of learner autonomy on the success of listening Comprehension. Doctoral dissertation, Turaky University.
Azari Noughabi, Mostafa & Amirian, Seyed Mohammad Reza (2020) Assessing the Contribution of Autonomy and Self-Efficacy to EFL Teachers’ Self-Regulation. English Teaching & Learning, 1-18. 45. 10.1007/s42321-020-00060-4.
Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. the United Kingdom: Cambridge )University Press.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. NY: Freeman.
Bernhardt, E. (1997). Victim narratives or victimizing narratives? Discussions of the reinvention of language departments and language programs. ADFL Bulletin 29 (i), 13-19.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, 2nd Ed. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Challob, A.I. (2021). The effect of flipped learning on EFL students’ writing performance, autonomy, and
    motivation. Educ Inf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10434-1Chan, Y. W. (2003). Junior high school English teachers’ ideas of current English textbooks in Tainan County.
     National Kaohsiung: Normal University.
Capa-Aydin, Y., Sungur, S., & Uzuntiryaki, E. (2009). Teacher self-regulation: Examining a multidimensional construct. Educational Psychology, 29(3), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410902927825.
Dafei, D. (2007). An Exploration of the Relationship between Learner Autonomy and English Proficiency. Retrieved from www.asian efljournal.com/pta_Nov_07_dd.pdf.
Dehghannezhad, Saeideh (2019). The Relationship between Iranian EFL Teacherrs’ Self-efficacy, their Personality and Students’ Motivation. Unpublished MA thesis. University of Guilan.
Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-Theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. London: Psychology      Press.
Dornyei, Z. (2001). Motivation and Second Language Acquisition. Second Language Teaching & Curriculum
    Centre, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Fletcher, A., Guthrie, J., Steane, P., Roos, G. and Pike, S. (2003). Mapping stakeholder perceptions for a third sector organization. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4 (4), 505-527.
Gardner, R. C., Lalonde, R. N., Moorcroft, R., & Evers, F. T. (1985). Second Language Attrition: The Role of Motivation and Use. London, Ontario: University of Western Ontario, Department of Psychology.Gardner, R.
Gist, M. E. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource
     management. Academy of management review, 12(3), 472-485.
Haghi, M. (2009). The relationship between perceived self-efficacy and Iranian EFL learners’ autonomy. Unpublished master’s thesis, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran.
Helm, D. J. (2009). Improving English instruction through Neuro-Linguistic Programming. Education, 130 (1), 110-113
Huang, J. (2005). Teacher autonomy in language learning: A review of the research. Research Studies in
    Education, 3, 203–218.
Lashkarian, A., & Sayadian, S. (2015). The effect of Neuro Linguistic Programming (NLP) techniques on young Iranian EFL Learners’ motivation, learning improvement, and on teacher's success. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 510-516.‏
Lei, W & Yu-mei, L (2012). An Empirical Study of Listening Comprehension Strategies in Autonomous Learnign Environment. Sino-US English Teaching, 9, (11), 1695-1701.
Loewen, S. and Reinders, H. (2011). Key Concepts in Second Language Acquisition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy. definitions, issues and problems.  Dublin: Authentic.
McWhirter, E. H. (1992). A test of a model of the career commitment and aspirations of Mexican American high school girls. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
Pajares, F (2006). Self-efficacy During Childhood and Adolescence. Implications for Teachers and Parents. In F.
    Pajares and T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents (pp. 339-367). Greenwich, CT: Information Age. acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school
    achievement. In R. Riding, & S. Rayner (Eds.), Perception (pp. 239-266). London: Ablex Publishing.
Pallant, J., (2010). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using the SPSS program. 4th     Edition. McGraw Hill, New York.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1996). The role of goals and goal orientation. Motivation in Education: Theory,     Research, and Applications. New Jersey: Prentice-
Pishghadam, R., Shapoori, M., & Shayesteh, S. (2011). NLP and its relationship with teacher success, gender, teaching experience and degree: A comparative study. World Journal of English Language, 1(2), 2-8.
Revell, J, and S. Norman. (1999). Handing over: NLP-based activivties for language learning. London: Saffire Press.
Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge
    University Press.
Salomon, G. (1984). Television is "easy" and print is "tough": The differential investment of mental effort in    learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 647-658.
Shahmoradi, Nasim, Nosratinia, Mania, Shangarffam, Nacim (2018) The Relationship among EFL Teachers’     Critical Thinking, Neuro-Linguistic Programming, and Their Sense of Efficacy. Journal of Applied Linguistic    and Language Research,  5 (2), 41-56.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2017). Motivated for teaching? Associations with school goal structure, teacher     self-efficacy, job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 152–160.     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.006.
Tabachnick and Fidell, (2007) BG Tabachnick, LS Fidell Using Multivariate Statistics. (4th ed.).
Tabrizi, H. M., & Saeidi, M. (2015). The relationship among Iranian EFL learners’ self-efficacy, autonomy and listening comprehension ability. English Language Teaching, 8(12), 158–169.
Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: a developmental perspective. Educ.    Psychol. Rev. 6, 49–78. doi: 10.1007/BF02209024.
Zastrow, C., Dotson, V., & Koch, M. (1987). The neuro-linguistic programming treatment approach. Journal of Independent Social Work, 1(1), 29-38.
Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic    adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4),    981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801.
 
Zimmerman, B. J., and Cleary, T. J. (2006). Adolescents’ Development of Personal Agency.  The Role of Self-   efficacy Beliefs and Self-Regulatory Skill. In F. Pajares and T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents (pp. 45-69). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
 
 
 
 
    • Article View: 436
    • PDF Download: 373
Language Studies
Volume 13, Issue 1 - Serial Number 25
spring and summer
September 2022
Pages 283-305
Files
  • XML
  • PDF 261.74 K
History
  • Receive Date: 17 February 2022
  • Revise Date: 09 April 2022
  • Accept Date: 11 May 2022
Share
How to cite
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
Statistics
  • Article View: 436
  • PDF Download: 373

APA

Keyvani, A. , Oroji, M. R. , Jafari, S. and Izadpanah, S. (2022). The Role of the Neuro-Linguistic Programming in the Improvement of the Non-Iranian PFL Learners’ Autonomy and Motivation. Language Studies, 13(1), 283-305. doi: 10.30465/ls.2022.39912.2038

MLA

Keyvani, A. , , Oroji, M. R. , , Jafari, S. , and Izadpanah, S. . "The Role of the Neuro-Linguistic Programming in the Improvement of the Non-Iranian PFL Learners’ Autonomy and Motivation", Language Studies, 13, 1, 2022, 283-305. doi: 10.30465/ls.2022.39912.2038

HARVARD

Keyvani, A., Oroji, M. R., Jafari, S., Izadpanah, S. (2022). 'The Role of the Neuro-Linguistic Programming in the Improvement of the Non-Iranian PFL Learners’ Autonomy and Motivation', Language Studies, 13(1), pp. 283-305. doi: 10.30465/ls.2022.39912.2038

CHICAGO

A. Keyvani , M. R. Oroji , S. Jafari and S. Izadpanah, "The Role of the Neuro-Linguistic Programming in the Improvement of the Non-Iranian PFL Learners’ Autonomy and Motivation," Language Studies, 13 1 (2022): 283-305, doi: 10.30465/ls.2022.39912.2038

VANCOUVER

Keyvani, A., Oroji, M. R., Jafari, S., Izadpanah, S. The Role of the Neuro-Linguistic Programming in the Improvement of the Non-Iranian PFL Learners’ Autonomy and Motivation. Language Studies, 2022; 13(1): 283-305. doi: 10.30465/ls.2022.39912.2038

  • Home
  • About Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap

News

  • Article Submission & Processing Charges 2024-01-23
  • DOI International Dedication to Articles in the Journal ... 2020-10-31

Newsletter Subscription

Subscribe to the journal newsletter and receive the latest news and updates

© Journal management system. designed by sinaweb