• Register
  • Login
  • Persian

Language Studies

  1. Home
  2. A Cognitive-Constructional Account of Polysemy in “Head-Compounds”: A comparison between Persian and English

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

A Cognitive-Constructional Account of Polysemy in “Head-Compounds”: A comparison between Persian and English

    Author

    • َAva Imani

    Assistant Professor of Linguistics, Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

,

Document Type : Research original ,Regular Article

10.30465/ls.2022.39431.2025
  • Article Information
  • References
  • Download
  • How to cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

The aim of this comparative research is to investigate the polysemy of “head-compounds” in Persian and English and to identify the constructional schemas governing the construction of these compounds based on Construction Morphology (Booij, 2010). To this end, all compounds consisting of “head” as their first constituent were collected from different Persian and English sources. Our data consist of 300 compound words collected from Comprehensive Sokhan Dictionary, Zansoo Dictionary, Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary, Online Merriom-Webster, Collins, and Cambridge Dictionaries. Then the collected compounds were semantically categorized and their similarities and differences were examined. The findings showed that the polysemy in these compounds could be explained not at the level of words, but at the level of abstract constructions and constructional schemas in both languages. Therefore, it was considered as a type of constructional polysemy. Moreover, it was found that although there were similar constructional schemas and subschemas for "head-compounds” in both languages, the semantic variations and the number of subschemas in Persian were more than that of English. This difference indicated that the schematic hierarchy of the construction [Head-X] in Persian was more semantically complex and more extended compared to English.

Keywords

  • Construction Morphology
  • constructional schema
  • polysemy
  • compounding
  • Persian
  • English

Main Subjects

  • General linguistics
  • XML
  • PDF 581.44 K
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
References
انوری، حسن (1381). فرهنگ بزرگ سخن (8 جلد). تهران: سخن.
ایمانی، آوا و عادل رفیعی (1398). «تحلیلی ساخت‌محور از ترکیبات نام‌اندام «سر» در زبان فارسی». زبان‌پژوهی، س 11، ش 33، صص 129-159.
حسابی، اکبر (1396). «مقوله‌های شعاعی اندام‌های حوزه سر: بررسی‌ای شناختی». زبان‌پژوهی، س 9، ش 24، صص 87-109.
دهخدا، علی‌اکبر (1351). لغت‌نامه. تهران: نشر دانشگاه تهران.
رضائی باغ‌بیدی، حسن (1390). واژه نامۀ موضوعی زبان‌های باستانی ایران. تهران: فرهنگستان زبان و ادب فارسی.
کریمی‌باوریانی، زهرا و پارسا بامشادی (1395). «مجاز و استعاره در واژه‌های مرکب فارسی: با تمرکز بر واژه‌های حاوی نام‌اندام‌های "سر" و "دست». زبان‌کاوی، ش 3، 1-14.
کشانی، خسرو (1372). فرهنگ فارسی زانسو. تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
ملکی، ساسان و محمد راسخ‌مهند (1398). «تغییرپذیری در اصطلاحات دارای نام‌اندام سر در زبان فارسی». زبان فارسی و گویش‌های ایرانی. س 4، ش 2، 7-35.
 
Arcodia, G. F. (2012). “Construction and headedness in derivation and compounding”. Morphology, 22, 365-397.
Bauer, L. (2008). “Exocentric compounds”. Morphology, 18, 51-74.
Bisetto, A., & Scalise, S. (2005). “Classification of compounds”. Lingue e Linguaggio, 4(2), 319–332.
Booij, G. (2010). Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Booij. G. (2012). “Compounding and construction morphology”. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. pp. 322-347. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ceccagno, A., & Basciano, B. (2007). “Compound headedness in Chinese: An analysis of neologisms”. Morphology, 17, 207-231.
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hunnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization: a conceptual framework. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Hornby, A.S. (2001). Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Sixth edition. Oxford University Press.
Hüning, M., & Booij, G. (2014). “From compounding to derivation. the emergence of derivational affixes through constructionalization”. Folia Linguistica, 42 (2), 579-604.
Rainer, F. (2005). “Typology, diachrony, and universals of semantic change in word formation: a Romanist’s look at the polysemy of agent nouns”. In G. Booij, et al. (eds.). Proceedings of the Fifth Mediterranen Morphology Meeting. Catania: University of Catania, Faculty of Letters.
Scalise, S., & Guevara, E., (2009). “Searching for Universals in Compounding”. In S. Scalise et al. (Eds.), Universals of Language Today, 101-128.
وبگاه‌ها:
http://www.peykaregan.ir   
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/head (Online Merriam-Webster Dictionary, Accessed 6 Aug. 2020).
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/head. Accessed 6 Aug. 2020
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/head. Accessed 6 Aug. 2020
    • Article View: 397
    • PDF Download: 744
Language Studies
Volume 14, Issue 1 - Serial Number 1
September 2023
Pages 57-86
Files
  • XML
  • PDF 581.44 K
History
  • Receive Date: 15 December 2021
  • Revise Date: 15 July 2022
  • Accept Date: 17 July 2022
Share
How to cite
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
Statistics
  • Article View: 397
  • PDF Download: 744

APA

Imani, َ. (2023). A Cognitive-Constructional Account of Polysemy in “Head-Compounds”: A comparison between Persian and English. Language Studies, 14(1), 57-86. doi: 10.30465/ls.2022.39431.2025

MLA

Imani, َ. . "A Cognitive-Constructional Account of Polysemy in “Head-Compounds”: A comparison between Persian and English", Language Studies, 14, 1, 2023, 57-86. doi: 10.30465/ls.2022.39431.2025

HARVARD

Imani, َ. (2023). 'A Cognitive-Constructional Account of Polysemy in “Head-Compounds”: A comparison between Persian and English', Language Studies, 14(1), pp. 57-86. doi: 10.30465/ls.2022.39431.2025

CHICAGO

َ. Imani, "A Cognitive-Constructional Account of Polysemy in “Head-Compounds”: A comparison between Persian and English," Language Studies, 14 1 (2023): 57-86, doi: 10.30465/ls.2022.39431.2025

VANCOUVER

Imani, َ. A Cognitive-Constructional Account of Polysemy in “Head-Compounds”: A comparison between Persian and English. Language Studies, 2023; 14(1): 57-86. doi: 10.30465/ls.2022.39431.2025

  • Home
  • About Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap

News

  • Article Submission & Processing Charges 2024-01-23
  • DOI International Dedication to Articles in the Journal ... 2020-10-31

Newsletter Subscription

Subscribe to the journal newsletter and receive the latest news and updates

© Journal management system. designed by sinaweb