حق بین، فریده؛ پریسا نجفی و طلعت جمالی. (1395). روایت و ضدّ روایت در گفتمان حقوقی. مطالعات زبان‌ها و گویش‌های غرب ایران, 3(14), 37-59. doi: 10.22126/jlw.2016.1273
مؤمنی، نگار. (1389). زبان شناسی قانونی: بررسی شهادت در دادگاه با توجه به ویژگی‌های زبانی .فصلنامه کارآگاه، دوره دوم، سال سوم، شماره 10.
مؤمنی، نگار. (1391). تحلیل جرم زبانی «دروغ در نظام قضایی» از منظر زبانشناسی حقوقی (مطالعه موردی در محاکم قضایی تهران). دو فصلنامة علمی پژوهشی زبان‌پژوهی دانشگاه الزهرا (س) سال چهارم، شماره 7.
نجفی، پریسا و فریده حق‌بین. (1398). کاربرد پرسشی‌ها در بازجویی. زبانشناسی و گویش های خراسان، 11(1)، 313-333. doi: 10.22067/lj.v11i1.82798
نجفی، پریسا و فریده حق‌بین. (1399). راهبردهای کلامی در تعامل بازجویی (جستاری در گفتمان‌کاوی قضائی). جستارهای زبانی (11)4. 391-418.
Amsterdam, A. & Bruner, J. (2000). Minding the law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18, 1–21
Georgakopoulou, A. & Goutsos, D. (2000). Revisiting discourse boundaries: The narrative and non-narrative modes. Text, 20(1), 63–82.
Georgakopoulou, A. (2006). Thinking big with small stories in narrative and identity analysis, Narrative Inquiry, 16(1). 122–30.
Harris, S. (2001). Fragmented narratives and multiple tellers: witness and defendant accounts in trials, Discourse Studies, 3(1). 53–74.
Harris, S. (2005). Telling stories and giving evidence: the hybridisation of narrative and non-narrative modes of discourse in a sexual assault trial, in J. Thornborrow and J. Coates (eds), The Sociolinguistics of Narrative, Amsterdam: Benjamins, 215–37.
Heffer, C. (2002). ‘If you were standing in Marks & Spencers’: Narrativisation and comprehension in the English summing-up. In J. Cotterill (Ed.), Language in the legal process (pp. 228–245). London: Palgrave.
Heffer, C. (2005) The Language of Jury Trial: A Corpus-Aided Analysis of Legal–Lay Discourse, Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Heffer,c. (2010). Constructing crime stories in court. Coulthard, Malcom., Johnson Alison (ed). The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics. 199-216. UK: Routledge Publication.
Hobbs, P. (2003) ‘“Is that what we’re here about?” A lawyer’s use of impression management in a closing argument at trial’, Discourse and Society, 14(3), 273–90.
Holmgreen, L & Vestergaard, T. (2009). Evaluation and audience acceptance in biotech news texts. Journal of Pragmatics 41. 586–601.
Hunston, S. (2011). Corpus approaches to evaluation: Phraseology and evaluative language. New York: Routledge.
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7. 173–192.
Hyland, K. (2008). Disciplinary voices: Interactions in research writing. English Text Construction 1. 5–22.
Johnstone, B. (2009). Stance, style, and the linguistic individual. In Alexandra Jaffe (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives, 29–52. New York: Oxford University Press
Labov,W. & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays in the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle,WA: University of Washington Press.
Labov, W. (1972). Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, W. (1997. Further steps in narrative analysis. Journal of Narrative and Life History
7, 395–415.
Pennington, N. & Hastie, R. (1991). A cognitive theory of juror decision making: the story model, Cardozo Law Review, 13, 519–57.
Schiffrin, D. (1981). Tense variation in narrative. Language 57, 45–62.
Simpson, P. (1993). Language, ideology and point of view. London: Routledge.
)