آرین‌پور، مهلا . (1399). دانشنامه عصب-روان‌شناسی زبان، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، تهران ،ایران .

ترابی، محمد‌حسن. (۱۳۹۸). ارزیابی مهارت‌های زبانی بیماران آسیب‌دیده مغزی نیمکره راست فارسی‌زبان بر پایه پروتکل ارزیابی مهارت‌های ارتباطی مونترال (ام. ای. سی.) (رساله دکتری). پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، تهران.

رقیب‌دوست، شهلا، مدرسی‌تهرانی، یحیی، فره، پرین، اسکا، برندت، کوته، الن و ژوانت، ایوز. پروتکل ارزیابی مهارت‌های ارتباطی مونترال (ام. ای. سی). (در دست انتشار).

رفیعی، زینب. (۱۳۹۳). بررسی و مقایسه ابزارهای انسجامی در گفتار بیماران سکته مغزی نیمکره راست و چپ بر اساس دیدگاه هلیدی و حسن (پایان‌نامه کارشناسی‌ارشد). دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان.

• Andreetta, S., Cantagallo, A., & Marini, A. (2012). Narrative discourse in anomia aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 50(8), 1787-93.
• Barker, M. S., Young, B., & Robinson, G. A. (2017). Cohesive and coherent connected speech deficits in mild stroke. Brain & Language, 168, 23–36.
• Beeman, M., & Chiarello, C. (1998). Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience. Mahwah, N. J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Blake, M. L. (2006). Clinical relevance of discourse characteristics after right hemisphere brain damage. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 15(3), 255-267.
• Brownell, H., & Stringfellow, A. (1999). Making requests: Illustrations of how right-hemisphere brain damage can affect discourse production. Brain and Language,68(3),442-465.
• Caplan, D. (1987). Neurolinguistics and linguistic aphasiology: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
• Chantraine, Y., Joanette, Y., & Cardebat, D. (1998). Impairment of discourse-level representations and processes. In Stemer, B. & Whitaker, H. A. (Eds). Hand book of neurolinguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Clinton, L., Kristen, M. T., & Matthew, J. T. (2008). Discourse Impairments Following Right Hemisphere Brain Damage: A Critical Review. Language and linguistics compass , 2(6), 1038–1062.
• Cocks, N., Hird, K., & Kirsner, K. (2007). The relationship between right hemisphere damage and gesture in spontaneous discourse. Aphasiology, 21(3-4), 299–319.
• Crystal, D. (2008). Dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
• Davis, G. A., & Coelho, C. A. (2004). Referential cohesion and logical coherence narration after closed head injury. Brain and Language, 89(3), 508–523.
• Davis, G. A., O’Neil-Pirozzi, T. M., & Coon, M. (1997). Referential cohesion and logical coherence of narration after right hemisphere stroke. Brain and Language, 56(2),183–210.
• Ferré, P., Fonseca, R. P., Ska, B., & Joanette, Y. (2012). Communicative clusters following a right hemisphere stroke: Are there universal clinical profiles? Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica: International Journal of Phoniatrics, Speech Therapy and Communication Pathology, 64(4), 199-207.
• Jerônimo, G. M., Carlos, L., Marrone, P., & Scherer, L. C. (2011). Narrative discourse comprehension in right hemisphere brain damage: A single case study. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 23, 203–204.
• Kibrik, A. A. (2011). Reference in discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Lomlomdjian, C., Múnera, C. P., Low, D. M., Terpiluk, V., Solís P., & Abusamra, V. (2017). The right hemisphere’s contribution to discourse processing: A study in temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain & Language, 171, 31–41.
• Marini, A., Carlomagno, S., Caltagirone, C., & Nocentini, U. (2005). The role played by the right hemisphere in the organization of complex textual structures. Brain and Language, 93(1), 46–54.
• Marini, A. (2012). Characteristics of Narrative Discourse Processing after Damage to the Right Hemisphere. Seminars in Speech and Language 33(1):68-78.
• Maharunnisa, P., & Hema, N. (2020). Discourse in wernicke’s aphasia, Aphasiology, 34(9),1138-1163.
• Mäkinen, L., Loukusa, S., Nieminen, L., Leinonen, E., & Kunnari, S. (2014). The development of narrative productivity, syntactic complexity, referential cohesion and event content in four-to eight-year-old Finnish children. First Language, 34(1), 24-42.
• Minga, J. (2016). Discourse production and right hemisphere disorder. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 1(2), 96-105.
• Parola, A., Gabbatore, I., Bosco, FM., Bara, BG., Cossa, FM., & Gindri, P. (2016). Assessment of pragmatic impairment in right hemisphere damage. Journal of Neurolinguistics. 1(39), 10–25.
• Petersen, D. B. (2011). A systematic review of narrative-based language intervention with children who have language impairment. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 32(4), 207-220.
• Tompkins, C. A., Fassbinder, W., Scharp, V. L.,& Meigh, K. M. (2008) Activation and maintenance of peripheral semantic features of unambiguous words after right hemisphere brain damage in adults. Aphasiology, 22(2), 119-138.
• Ulatowska, H. K., Allard, L., Reyes, B. A., Ford, J., & Chapman, S. (1992). Conversational discource in aphasia. Aphasiology, 6(3), 325–331.
• Vanhalle, C., Lemieux, S., Joubert, S., Goulet, P., Ska, B., & Joanette, Y. (2000). Processing of speech acts by right hemisphere brain-damaged patients: An ecological approach. Aphasiology, 14(11), 1127–1141.