بررسی جایگاه و خویشکاری daēnā- در اوستا و ارتباط آن با cistā-

نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری فرهنگ و زبانهای باستانی، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، تهران، ایران

2 استاد فرهنگ و زبانهای باستانی، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، تهران ، ایران

3 دانشیار فرهنگ و زبانهای باستانی، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، تهران، ایران

چکیده
واژۀ اوستایی دئنا به معنای «ادراک، بینش، دیدگاه، خود درونی، وجدان و حتی دین» است. شانزدهمین یشت از اوستا، دین‌یشت، به نام دئنا نامگذاری شده است، گرچه در محتوای خود به چیستا اختصاص دارد. چیستا ایزدبانوی «راه و سفر» است، این خویشکاری او از توصیفاتی که از او در نخستین بند از دین‌یشت شده هویداست، که او را به عنوان «راهنما و هدایتگر» توصیف می‌کند. یکی از خویشکاری‌های دئنا نیز، هم در گاهان و هم در اوستای نو، نقش او به عنوان «راهنما و هدایتگر روان» است. در متن اوستایی سیروزه، چیستا در همان روزی که به نام دئناست ستوده می‌شود. در بند 126 مهریشت، چیستا upamana-دئنا مزدیسناست. برخی از پژوهشگران upamana- را «خود دیگر یا همزاد» ترجمه کرده‌اند و از این رو چیستا را «خود دیگر یا همزاد» دئنا دانسته‌اند. در این پژوهش نخست این دو واژه از منظر ریشه‌شناختی بررسی خواهند شد و سپس از طریق متون اوستایی به خویشکاری‌های هر کدام پرداخته خواهد شد تا به شباهت‌ها و همانندی‌های آنها پی برده شود. با توجه به شواهد موجود، به نظر نمی‌رسد که چیستا «خود دیگر یا همزاد» دئنا باشد و تنها از نظر خویشکاری با هم همپوشانی دارند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Examining the position and function of the daēnā- in Avesta and its connection with cistā-

نویسندگان English

Fahimeh Shafiei Mohamadabadi 1
Zohreh Zarshenas 2
Farzaneh Goshtasb 3
1 Ph.D. Candidate of Ancient Culture and Languages, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies,Tehran, Iran
2 Professor of Ancient Culture and Languages, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor of Ancient Culture and Languages, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Abstract:
The Avestan word daēnā- literally means “perception, vision, view, insight, self, conscience and even religion.” Yašt 16, Dēn yašt is named after daēnā māzdaiiasnī-, although in its content it is dedicated to cistā. cistā is a goddess of path. The epithets ascribed to her in the first verse of the Yašt 16 indicate her function as a guide. One of the functions of daēnā, both in Gāhān and New Avesta is her role as guide and spiritual leader. In the Sirōzag, cistā is worshipped in the day named in honor of daēnā. Yašt 10.126 makes cistā- the upamana- of the daēnā, that is to say something like her “alter ego”. Some researchers have translated upamana- as “alter ego” or “double”, therefore considered cistā as “alter ego” of daēnā. In this research, these two words will be examined from the etymological point of view. Then, through Avestan texts, each of them will be discussed in order to understand their similarities and resemblances. According to the available evidence, it does not seem that cistā is daēnā-'s “alter ego”. One should assume that the two deities overlap in functions.
Keywords: daēnā-, cistā-, Dēn yašt, Gāhān, New Avesta.

Introduction
daēnā- is a theological and philosophical term with a variety of meanings: “perception, vision, view, insight, self, conscience and even religion.” daēnā- is the existence of one's moral qualities. daēnā- with the function and capacity to distinguish between good and bad actions, it is the embodiment of moral conscience, which was given to humans as an offering by Ahura Mazda. In the Old Avesta, this capacity is more perceived in a perceptual way, rather than having a real divine form. In the New Avesta, this capacity for moral purification appears in the form of a young and beautiful maiden before the soul of a pious person after his death. One of her characteristics in Avesta is her connection with the “path”, which is in line with her function in guiding the soul “uruuan-” to the transcendental world. This function makes her similar to the goddess cistā-, who is clearly the goddess of “path and travel” according toher Yašt, dēn yašt. This issue leads to the formation of a hypothesis that can we find other similarities and resemblance between daēnā- and cistā- in Avestan texts? Is it possible to go as far as to consider cistā- as the “other self” or an “alter ego” of daēnā-? This question will be answered in this article.

Materials and Methods
The method used in this article is descriptive-analytical, based on collecting information from library sources.

Discussion & Result
In Old Avesta, daēnā- appears three times with “path”. Since one of the duties of daēnā- in New Avesta is to show the way and guide the soul “uruuan” to the transcendental world, it seems that the combination of “path” and daēnā- in Old Avesta also refers to this function. In Gāhān cistā- is used only in the compound noun pouru.cistā-. The last Gāhān, seems to be the wedding hymn of pouru.cistā-, Zoroaster's youngest daughter. Some scholars think that pouru.cistā- is the same as daēnā- in this Yasn. In New Avesta, Yašt 16th, emphasizes the role of the goddess cistā- in guidance and that is why she is called the goddess of “path and journey”. In the final part of the first stanza of Dēn Yašt, daēnā- māzdaiiasni- is described as equal and similar to cistā-. Based on this, many Avestan scholars have considered these two to be the same goddesses. In addition, Yašt 10.126 makes cistā- the upamana- of the daēnā, that is to say something like her “alter ego”. Some researchers have translated upamana- as “alter ego” or “double”, therefore considered cistā as “alter ego” of daēnā. In New Avesta, both daēnā- and cistā- are associated with dawn light, therefore are closely related to the Vedic dawn goddess uṣắs-. Both are related to the verb of seeing, daēnā- sees, is seen and causes to be seen, like cistā-, whose name means “to be noticed and seen”. Due to these similarities, many scholars consider cistā- and daēnā- to be the same goddess.

Conclusion
According to the Avestan texts, there are similarities between daēnā- and cistā-, but it is not possible to go as far as to consider cistā- as the "other self" or as the “alter ego” of daēnā-, one should assume that the two deities overlap in functions. Unlike cistā-, daēnā- in both Gāhān and New Avesta is associated with death and the guidance of the soul in the world after death. Since daēnā- is formed based on one's choices in life, so if he chooses evil, his daēnā- will also “lose the truth and the right path.” (Y.51/13) or in Hadoxt Nask 3 daēnā- the evil person becomes an ugly old woman who leads him to the “dangerous world”. But nowhere in the Avesta is cistā- a guide towards evils and ugliness. All that has been said emphasizes the close connection of daēnā- with cistā-. But the proofs and clues are not enough to think of them as “alter ego or other selves”. Interference and intermingling of functions and characteristics in some Avestan texts has caused them to be identified as the same.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

daēnā-
cistā-
Dēn ya&‌‌scaron
t
Gāhān
New Avesta
بویس، مری. (1386)، آیین زرتشت کهن روزگار و قدرت ماندگارش. ترجمۀ ابوالحسن تهامی. تهران: موسسۀ انتشارات نگاه.
زرشناس، زهره. (1382)، دائره المعارف زن ایرانی. به سرپرستی دکتر مجتبی اجتهادی، ج1، ذیل مدخل چیستا، تهران: بنیاد دانشنامۀ بزرگ فارسی.
کلنز، ژان. (1386)، مقالاتی دربارۀ زردشت و دین زردشتی. ترجمۀ احمدرضا قائم­مقامی. تهران: نشر و پژوهش فرزان روز.
میرفخرایی، مهشید. (1386)، هادخت نسک. تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
میرفخرایی، مهشید. (1393)، بررسی دستوری و محتوایی گاه 51 «وهوخشثره گاه». تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
میرفخرایی، مهشید. (1396)، زردشت و گاهان، بررسی دستوری و محتوایی دو فصل 47 و 48 سپنتامنیوگاه (اوستا و زند). تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
Bartholomae, Christian. (1904), Altiranisches Wörterbuch. Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner.
Benveniste, Émile, and Louis Renou. (1934). “Vṛtra et Vṛϑragna: Ètude de mythologie indoiranienne” Cahiers de la société asiatique 3. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.
Boyce, Mary (1996), A History of Zoroastrianism. Vol. I. Leiden: Brill.
Cantera, Alberto. (2013), “Talking with God: The Zoroastrian ham.paršti or Intercalation Ceremonies” Journal Asiatique 301: 85-138.
https://doi.org/10.2143/JA.301.1.2994461.
Cantera, Alberto. (2016), “The Sacrifice (Yasna) to Mazdā: Its Antiquity and Variety”. In Alan Williams, Sarah Stewart, and Almut Hintze, eds. The Zoroastrian Flame: Exploring Religion, History and Tradition. London: I.B. Tauris: 61-76
Colpe, Carsten. (1981), “Daēnā, Lichtjungfrau, zweite Gestalt: Verbindungen und Unterschiede zwischen zarathustrischer und manichäischer Selbstanschauung”. In Studies in Gnosticism and Hellenistic Religions: Presented to Gilles Quispel on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday, edited by R. van den Broek and M. J. Vermaseren, Leiden: E.J. Brill: 58-77.
Gershevitch, Ilya. (1959), The Avestan Hymn to Mithra. London: Cambridge University Press.
Hintze, Almut. (2007), A Zoroastrian Liturgy: The Worship in Seven Chapters. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
Humbach, Helmut. (1991), The Gāthās of Zarathushtra and the other old Avestan Texs.Vol. I. Heidelberg: Carl Winter. Universitatsverlag.
Kellens, Jean & Pirart, Eric. (1990), Les Textes Vieil Avestiques. Vol. II. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag.
Kellens, Jean. (1994), “La Fonction Aurorale de Mithra et la Daēnā”. In Studies in Mithraism, Papers Associated with the Mithraic Panel Organized on the Occasion of the XVIth Congress of the International Association for the History of Religions, Rome 1990, edited by John R. Hinnells, Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider: 165–71.
Kellens, Jean. (1995), “L’Ame entre le Cadavre et le Paradis”, Journal Asiatique 283: 19-56.
Kellens, Jean. (2013), “Le Jour se Lève à la Fin de la Gâthâ Ahunauuaiti”, Journal Asiatique 301: 53-84.
Kreyenbroek, Philip. (1991), “On the shaping of Zoroastrian theology. Aši, Vǝrǝϑraγna and the promotion of the Amǝšạ Spǝṇtas”. In: Paul Bernard/Frantz Grenet (Hrsg.): Histoire et cultes de l'Asie centrale préislamique: sources écrites et documents archéologiques; actes du colloque international du CNRS: 137-45.
Lankarany, Firouz-Thomas. (1985), Daēnā im Avesta: Eine semantische Untersuchung. Germany: Rheinbeck.
Lincoln, Bruce. (2021), Religion, Culture, and Politics in Pre-Islamic Iran. Leiden, Boston: Brill.
Pirart, Eric. (2006), L'Aphrodite Iranienne. Paris: Association Kubaba.
Pirart, Eric. (2008), “Les Épouses de Zoroastre et le Dēn Yašt”, Journal Asiatique 296.1: 59-91. https://doi.org/10.2143/JA.296.1.2034493
Pirart, Eric. (2012), Corps et Ames du Mazdéen: Le lexique zoroastrien de l’eschatologie individuelle. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Piras, Andrea. (2003), “Daēnā with White Arms”. In Ātaš-e Dorun. The Fire Within: Jamshid Soroush Soroushian Memorial Volume. Indiana: Bloomington: 345-351.
Rezania, Kianoosh. (2017), Raumkonzeptionen im Früheren Zoroastrismus: Kosmische, kultische und soziale Räume. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Rezania, Kianoosh. (2020), “Religion in Late Antique Zoroastrianism and Manichaeism, Developing a Term in Counterpoint”. In Entangled Religions 11.2: 1-32. https://doi.org 10.13154/er.11.2020.8556
Schwartz, Martin. (2010), “Pouruchista’s Gathic Wedding and the Teleological Composition of the Gathas”. In: Exegisti Monumenta: Festschrift in honour of Nicolas Sims-Williams, eds. 13 W. Sundermann, A. Hintze and F. de Blois, Wisebaden. 429-447.
 
 
 
  
دوره 17، شماره 2
اسفند 1405
صفحه 61-89

  • تاریخ دریافت 14 آبان 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 23 فروردین 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 13 اردیبهشت 1403