افراشی، آزیتا؛ صامت، سجاد (1393). تحلیل چندمعنایی فعل حسی «شنیدن» در زبان فارسی، ادب پژوهی، دانشگاه گیلان.
افراشی، آزیتا؛ عسگری، ساناز (1396). چندمعنایی فعل حسی دیدن در زبان فارسی: پژوهشی شناختی و پیکرهای. پژوهش‌های زبانشناسی تطبیقی، سال هفتم، شماره 14.
انوری، حسن (1381). فرهنگ بزرگ سخن، تهران: سخن.
دهخدا، علی اکبر و همکاران (1325). لغتنامه دهخدا، تهران: سازمان لغتنامه.
راسخ‌مهند، محمد (1391). درآمدی بر زبانشناسی شناختی نظریه‌ها و مفاهیم، چاپ دوم، انتشارات سمت.
قادری، مهدی؛ یوسفی راد، فاطمه؛ افراشی، بآزیتا؛ روشن، بلقیس (1398). چندمعنایی نظام‌مند در رویکرد شناختی، تحلیل چندمعنایی فعل حسّ دیدن در زبان فارسی، فصلنامه مطالعات زبان‌ها و گویش‌های غرب ایران، دوره هفتم، شماره 4، صص73-91.
Allwood, J & P, Gardenfors. (1999), Cognitive Semantics: Meaning and Cognition. Amestrdam- Philadelphia: John Benjamins
Antuñano, I. I. (1999). Polysemy and Metaphor in Perception Verbs: a Cross-linguistic Study. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.
Asher, N. (2011). Lexical Meaning in Context. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Blutner, R. (1998). “Lexical pragmatics”. J. Semant. 15 (2). Pp. 115-162.
Brugman, C. & G. Lakoff ,(1988), “Cognitive Topology and Lexical Networks”. In: Small, S., Carston, R., 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford
Brugman, C. (1981), the Story of Over, MA Thesis. University of California in Berkeley.
Copestake, A. & T. Briscoe, (1995), “Semi-productive polysemy and sense extension”. J. Semant. 12 (1), 15-67. Editorial,2015. Polysemy:current perspectives and approaches. Lingua157. Pp. 1-16
Crystal, D. (1991). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge University Press.
Evans, V. & M. Green (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Goldstein, E. B. (2010), Sensation and perception (8th ed.), Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Ibarretxe-Antunano, I. ( 2013), “The power of the senses and the role of culture in metaphor and language”, (in press) In R.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., (1999), Polysemy and Metaphor in Perception Verbs: a Crosslinguistic Study.Ph. D. Thesis, University of Foreign Studies.
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kilgarriff, A. (1992). Polysemy (PhD thesis). University of Sussex.
Kilgarriff, A. (1992). Polysemy (PhD thesis). University of Sussex
Kim, E. & H-Yun, Lee. (2011). The semantic extensions of Korean verbs of perception, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies.
Kovecses, Zolta´n (1988). “The language of love: The semantics of passion”, in convers ational English, Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press
Lakoff, G. (1987), Women, Fire and Dangerous Things, What Categories Reveal about the Mind, Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987). “Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind, Chicago”. The University of Chicago Press, Illinois. Editorial / Lingua. 157 (2015). Pp. 1-16 15
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980), Metaphors we live by, Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Sjöström, S. (1998). From vision to cognition a study of metaphor and polysemy in Swedish. John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Sweetser, E. (1984), Semantic structure and semantic change: A cognitive linguistic study of modality, perception, speech acts, and logical relations
Sweetser, E., (1990), From Etymology to Pragmatics. Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, J. R. (1995), Linguistic Categorization, Prototypes in Linguistic Theory (2 nd.). Oxford: Claredon.
)